Skip to content
IPEX Logo
  • About
    • Our company
    • The IPEX process
  • Solutions
    • Developers and principals
    • Builders
    • Lenders
    • Project managers
    • Subcontractors
    • Construction lawyers
    • IPEX application scenarios
    • Compliance
    • Developers and principals
    • Builders
    • Lenders
    • Project managers
    • Subcontractors
    • Construction lawyers
    • IPEX Monitor
      NEW

    Resources

    • IPEX application scenarios
    • Compliance
  • Distressed Projects
  • Case studies
    • Balmain & Co
    • Kervale
    • NASH Project management
  • Industry updates
  • Contact
Book a demo
Log in

Reducing Lender Risk on Developer-Builder Projects

August 13, 2024

Whilst lenders have traditionally shied away from the developer-builder model, it is becoming increasingly difficult to get a project off the ground with a third-party builder in some sections of the market – this has forced lenders to reconsider their position. But although many lenders are now warming to the idea of funding developer-builder projects, the underlying risks that have long made them nervous remain.

The obvious downside for the lender is that they no longer have two parties sharing the risk – if the builder goes under, so too does the borrower which makes delivery the lender’s problem. There is also the big question of governance – when the developer and builder are one and the same, the financial checks and balances fall entirely to the lender.

PAYMENT TRANSPARENCY + SYSTEM CONTROLS = AUTOMATION OF FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT PROCESSES

Whilst lenders already demand additional oversight under the developer-builder model, these checks are: a) largely manual and b) rely on information that is sourced from the borrower – not ideal when one of the primary risks to the lender is the potential for the developer-builder to divert funds to other projects. Of course, satisfying the extra checks requires the developer-builder to supply extra information – the administrative burden on both parties is significant.

IPEX largely solves the financial oversight problem for lenders by placing practical limits on how the borrower can use project funds; only subcontractors, suppliers and consultants linked to the project can be paid from the account. And rather than relying solely on a ‘stat dec’, IPEX allows the lender to verify that those linked to previous claims have been paid before releasing further funds. 

In addition, as IPEX removes the need for manual oversight checks by the lender, it also removes the admin associated with ‘proving’ compliance from the borrower – the lender can already see that the right people have been paid. 


Lender protections under IPEX include: 

  • All progress payments are ring-fenced to the project 
  • Subcontractors and suppliers are subject to full KYC/AML checks and have account details independently verified before they are eligible for payment– IPEX blocks payment if entity/bank account details don’t match
  • The lender can view (and if need be, approve of) any subcontractors and suppliers that are linked to the project account before they are eligible for payment
  • The lender can confirm which subcontractors and suppliers have been paid, when and how much* making ‘cost to complete’ reports far more reliable
  • Certain ‘key trades’ may be set to ‘open book’ to satisfy lender oversight requirements whilst other contract/payment values can remain confidential (payments made under standard view are expressed as a percentage of contract value – sufficient to ensure amounts paid are in line with work performed onsite) 
  • If required, the lender can view/approve of any payment due to the developer and/or builder entities i.e. payment for preliminaries, margin, fees or other direct costs

Not only is IPEX helping lenders approve funding for those who have adopted the developer-builder model out of necessity, established operators may start to see new lenders competing for their business.


EXTENSIVE PROTECTION IF THE DEVELOPER-BUILDER ENTERS ADMINISTRATION

Should a payment default event occur, IPEX helps to minimise the impact to the lender via a range of practical controls that complement existing legal protections. 

Progress payments already made to the developer-builder via IPEX have either been distributed to approved subcontractors and suppliers or remain in the account – the funds can’t be siphoned off to other projects/accounts in the period leading up to the appointment of administrators. 

In addition, the lender receives full visibility of all previous transactions, removing much of the work associated with substantiating creditor claims and establishing their exact position on the project. 

REDUCE RISK AND AUTOMATE OVERSIGHT CHECKS – IPEX SIMPLIFIES LENDING FOR DEVELOPER-BUILDER PROJECTS

As developers increasingly look to manage both construction cost and risk by building themselves, lender comfort becomes the primary issue. IPEX removes many of the fundamental barriers to lender acceptance of the developer-builder model, helping capable developers to get feasible projects off the ground with relative ease.


* Standard developer portal view shows payment as % of contract value. Open book developer portal view shows subcontract/payment values.


Post navigation

Previous
Next

Recent posts

  • construction payment platform
    9 new IPEX features
  • Introducing IPEX Monitor
  • De-Risking Builder Recommendations

Related posts

Should A Builder Need Access To Subcontractor Entitlements?

May 27, 2024

Leading Commercial Builder Balmain and Co Weighs In…  For every developer that is mandating the use of IPEX on their projects, there is another that would like the additional protection, but doesn’t think that their builder would agree. Is it unreasonable to ask a builder to operate under the condition that they can ‘only’ access […]

Don’t Wait Until Your Money Is Gone

April 8, 2024

The Check That Helps Developers ‘Step In’ Before Their Builder Enters Administration ‘Step In’ Rights Are Great In Theory – But Will They Protect You In Practice? It’s typical for developers to incorporate ‘step in’ rights into their head contract, giving them the right to pay subcontractors and suppliers directly should the builder fail to […]

How To Validate A Builders ‘Stat Dec’

March 13, 2024

Can You Pick A False Stat Dec From A True One?  Despite being one of the core requirements for the release of funds by developers and lenders (not to mention, a legal document), the ‘stat dec’ has become something of a ‘tick and flick’ item in practice, carrying extraordinarily little weight. But this is not […]

IPEX logo

Revolutionising construction financial management

Solutions
  • Developers and Principals
  • Builder
  • Lenders
  • Project managers
  • Subcontractors
  • Construction lawyers
  • Distressed projects
  • Compliance
Company
  • About us
  • The IPEX process
  • IPEX application scenarios
  • Industry updates
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Builder sign up
Website
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy policy
Social
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube